On Sun, 30 Apr 1995, yoDtargh wrote:
> I was explaining why I thought your translation {no' pagh} and {no'lI'
> pagh} was incorrect by demonstrating how Section 5.2 says numbers are
> to be used.
But pagh is also a noun meaning none. My post was really asking about
how to distinguish the two and how they relate.
janSIy