On Sat, 29 Apr 1995, Jeremy Cowan wrote:
> I don't see how this relates to my post. Or does it?
Yes, I thought it did. In my reply, I was disagreeing with your
translations. I was explaining why I thought your translation {no' pagh}
and {no'lI' pagh} was incorrect by demonstrating how Section 5.2 says
numbers are to be used.
> janSIy
yoDtargh