- Qov At 01:56 '?????' 6/6/2012, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
Qov:
>>> qepHomwIjDaq jatlh ghojwI', "chay' <125,000> jIjatlh?"
*{wa' chorghvI' 'uy'}
No, not really, but I wish *{-vI'} generalised in this way (from {vatlhvI'}).
qurgh:
>> wa'bIp cha'netlh vaghSaD
Qov:
> That makes sense. Is that canonical, qurgh?
Why else would we have {bIp} and {netlh}?
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol