tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 12 17:00:02 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:59:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56605@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56606@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0

On 1/12/2010 7:11 PM, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2010, at 21:32, Steven Boozer wrote:
>
>> >  This should of course be:  {majQa'! vIparHa'qu'!!} ("Well done! I
>> >  like it a lot!!")
 >
> Or, in a nice casing orthography, "Majxa'! Viparha'qu'!!"

My Ajax! Viper haiku!!

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/

References:
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Alex Greene <[email protected]>
- RE: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Michael Everson <[email protected]>
- RE: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Michael Everson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Next by Date: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Previous by thread: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Next by thread: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Index(es):