On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:41 PM, qurgh lungqIj wrote:
> Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the -
> bogh
> clause or is that optional?
>
> na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
It's optional.
Since {na'rsn'e' rurbogh Soj} seems a silly thing to say, I would
consider marking {Soj} to be superfluous.
--ghunchu'wI'