On May 27, 2009, at 9:01 PM, qa'vaj wrote:
> {-vaD} also marks the indirect object.
I opine differently. What I recall TKD's addendum saying is that the
recipient of a gift may be considered the indirect object. I do not
consider someone being shot to be the same sort of thing. In my
mind, the target is a location, not a beneficiary.
-- ghunchu'wI'