tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 18 17:11:28 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:09:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' Voragh:

>> Klingon word:   len
>> Part of Speech: noun
>> Definition:     recess, break
>
> Never used in canon.
>
> Related nouns:
>
> {lenHom} "short break" CK

Why is this given special status as a "related noun" instead of just  
being considered a simple example of the noun bearing a suffix?

References:
- Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: QapHa''a' jabbI'IDghom?
Next by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: len (noun)
Next by thread: povam wanI' Daj
Index(es):

Back to archive top level