ja' QeS lagh:
> Or perhaps {tIntaHghach'e' raS nIv yIngu'} "as for largeness,
> identify the
> superior table"? Would that work?
I'm not very comfortable with this use of {-'e'}. It seems sloppy.
But now that you've suggested it:
raSvam'e' raSvetlh'e' je, nuq tIn law' latlh tIn puS?
-- ghunchu'wI'