tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 05 19:51:59 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:50:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:
>Ah, I see.  Hmm, yes, that would seem to make sense, in that it parallels
>the possible {X Hoch} idea.

{X Hoch} isn't just possible.  It's authoritatively correct.

KGT page 155:
  nIn Hoch natlhlu'pu' "All the fuel has been consumed."

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
  - From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

References:
- Did Hoch, now pagh...
  - From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
- Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
  - From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
- Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: use of 'e' in to-be construction
Next by Date: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je
Previous by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
Next by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
Index(es):

Back to archive top level