tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 27 05:31:24 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: *nuqDaqvo'

Lieven L. Litaer ([email protected])

From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: *nuqDaqvo'
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:30:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: qepHom.de
References: <[email protected]>
User-agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887

Am Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:43:14 EDT hat <[email protected]> 
geschrieben:

> If TKD didn't explicitly state that {nuqDaq} is {nuq} plus the type 5

I don't know.

> noun suffix {-Daq}, I would have no trouble accepting it as a compound 
> noun, capable of taking any other suffixes.

--> i.e. cf. e.g. etc. QongDaqDaq

Quvar.

References:
- *nuqDaqvo'
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Hol tam
Next by Date: Re: *nuqDaqvo'
Previous by thread: *nuqDaqvo'
Next by thread: Re: *nuqDaqvo'
Index(es):

Back to archive top level