tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 20 09:03:35 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:10:34 -0600
In-Reply-To: <723Z06JH84ZW1VBA6D63MISZVYX6.400d238b@quvar>
References: <[email protected]>


>Am 19.01.2004 20:03:51, schrieb [email protected]:
> >desert = verlassen, zurücklassen

Quvar:
>like an empty, deserted station where everyone has left?

No.  That's {chIm} "be empty, be deserted, be uninhabited".



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>

References:
- Aw: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Aw: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: nuqIpvIp cha'logh
Next by Date: Re: DCKL translation problems: {'Im}
Prev by thread: Re: Aw: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
Next by thread: Re: DCKL: translating problem: desert vs. defect
Index(es):

Back to archive top level