tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 06 13:47:20 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: time

Philip Newton ([email protected])

From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: time
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:53:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Organization: very little
References: <[email protected]> with last message <007b01c3d48b$464e8700$6500a8c0@c1199768b> <[email protected]>

On (No, or invalid, date.), "Regina Reusser"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > We have the verb {poH}and the noun {poH}.  I don't think we've
> > seen the verb in canon (though I'm sure to be corrected if I'm
> > mistaken).
>
> ... wot "poH" vISovbe' jIH...

wot DIp je ngaS TKD.

Philip

References:
- time
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: time
  - From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
- Re: Resources
  - From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
Next by Date: Re: time
Prev by thread: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
Next by thread: Re: Qapbe'chu' De'wI'wIj
Index(es):

Back to archive top level