tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 13 10:48:00 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}

From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:47:56 -0600
In-Reply-To: <000201c1e2f9$5bb97760$594ce8cd@dlorah>
References: <[email protected]>

At 10:41 2002-04-13 -0400, DloraH wrote:
> > K: loQ yIpupmoHHa'.
> > Gloss: Make it sightly imperfect.
>TKD p48 "... -Ha' always occurs right after the verb. ..."
>So this would have to be /loQ yIpupHa'moH/.

Oh, that's right!  I forget that it's a /non-roving/ rover. {loQ 
yIpupHa'moH} it is!


--
Sean M. Burke    http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/

References:
- to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
- RE: to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}
  - From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}
Next by Date: Re: "be'be'" - double negation
Prev by thread: RE: to' nech, 035: {loQ yIpupmoHHa'}
Next by thread: Seans translations
Index(es):

Back to archive top level