>Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 19:08:01 -0700
>From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
>Andre Seesink writes:
>> maj. jItlhIj, pItlh'a
>> good. I apologise, but it's done.
>I'm not sure {pItlh} is all that appropriate here; it works, but {rIntaH}
>seems better to me.
"pItlh" vImaS jIH. chaq Sar Qapla'lIj (ugh. That's probably bad.)
~mark